Look Who's Linking to PoliBlog:
Absinthe and Cookies
Accidental Verbosity
Admiral Quixote's Roundtable
All Day Permanent Red
All Things Jennifer
Ann Althouse
The American Mind
Arguing with signposts
Arms and influence
The Astute Blogger
Asymmeterical Information
B-Town Blog Boys
Backcountry Conservative
Balloon Juice
Bananas and Such Begging to Differ
The Bemusement Park
Bewtween the Coasts
Betsy's Page
The Big Picture
Blogs for Bush
The Blog of Daniel Sale
Boots and Sabers
The Bully Pulpit
Cadillac Tight
Caffeinated Musing
California Yankee
Captain's Quarters
Chicago Report
Chicagoland of Confusion
Citizen Smash
Collected Thoughts
The Command Post
Common Sense and Wonder
Confessions Of A Political Junkie
The Conservative Philosopher
Conservative Revolution
Conservative and Right
Cranial Cavity
The Daily Lemon
Daly Thoughts
DANEgerus Weblog
Dart Frog on a Cactus
Dean's World Dear Free World
Brad DeLong
Democracy Project
The Disagreeable Conservative Curmudgeon
Down to the Piraeus
Drink this...
Earl's log
Earthly Passions
The Education Wonks
the evangelical outpost
Eye of the Storm
Firepower Forward
The Flying Space Monkey Chronicles
The Friendly Ghost
Fruits and Votes
Functional, if not decorative
The Galvin Opinion
The Glittering Eye
Haight Speech
The Hedgehog Report
Heh. Indeed.
Hennessy's View
High Desert Skeptic
The Hillary Project
History and Perceptions
Robert Holcomb
I love Jet Noise
Idlewild South
Independent Thinker
Insults Unpunished
Internet Ronin
Ipse Dixit
It Can't Rain All The Time...
The Jay Blog
Jen Speaks
Joefish's Freshwater Blog
John Lemon blog
Judicious Asininity
Jump In, The Water's Fine!
Just On The Other Side
A Knight's Blog
The Kudzu Files
Let's Try Freedom
Liberty Father
Life and Law
David Limbaugh
Locke, or Demosthenes?
Mad Minerva
Gary Manca
Mark the Pundit
Mediocre but Unexciting
Mental Hiccups
Miller's Time
Mind of Mog
Minorities For Bush
Mr. Hawaii
The Moderate Voice
The Modulator
Much Ado
Mungowitz End
My opinion counts
my thoughts, without the penny charge
My Word
Neophyte Pundit
Neutiquam erro
New England Republican
NewsHawk Daily
neWs Round-Up
No Pundit Intended
Nobody asked me, but...
Obsidian Wings
Occam's Toothbrush
On the Fritz
On the Third Hand
One Fine Jay
Out of Context
Outside the Beltway
Suman Palit
Passionate America
Brian Patton
Peppermint Patty
John Pierce
The Politicker
The Politburo Diktat
Political Annotation
Political Blog For The Politically Incorrect
Power Politics
Practical Penumbra
Priorities & Frivolities
Prof. Blogger's Pontifications
Pros and Cons
protein wisdom
Pundit Heads
The Queen of All Evil
Quotes, Thoughts, and other Ramblings
Ramblings' Journal
Random Acts of Kindness
Random Nuclear Strikes
Ranting Rationalist
Read My Lips
Reagan Country
Red State Diaries
A Republican's Blog
The Review
Rhett Write
Right Side of the Rainbow
Right Wingin-It
Right Wing News
Right Voices
Rightward Reasonings
riting on the wall
Rooftop Report
The Sake of Argument
Sailor in the Desert
Secular Sermons
Sha Ka Ree
Shaking Spears
She Who Will Be Obeyed!
The Skeptician
The Skewed
Slobokan's Site O' Schtuff
small dead animals
Sneakeasy's Joint
SoCal Law Blog
A Solo Dialogue
Some Great Reward
Southern Musings
Speed of Thought...
Spin Killer
Matthew J. Stinson
A Stitch in Haste
Stop the ACLU
The Strange Political Road Trip of Jane Q. Public
The Strata-Sphere
Stuff about
Suman Palit
Target Centermass
Templar Pundit
The Temporal Globe
Tex the Pontificator
Texas Native
think about it...
Tobacco Road Fogey
Toner Mishap
Tony Talks Tech
The Trimblog
Truth. Quante-fied.
Twenty First Century Republican
Unlocked Wordhoard
Use The Forks!!
Ut Humiliter Opinor
Vista On Current Events
Vox Baby
Jeff Vreeland's Blog
Wall of Sleep
Weapons of Mass Discussion
Who Knew?
The Window Manager
Winning Again!
WizBang Tech
The World Around You
The Yin Blog
You Big Mouth, You!
Zygote-Design - Alabama Weblogs

AJC's 2004 Election Politics Sites and Blogs
Campaign Finance
Welcome to World O' Blogs
WRKO-AM's "Political Junkies" list
Yahoo! Directory Political Weblogs
Young Elephant

Who Links Here

Wednesday, August 17, 2005
On Being Purposefully Childless
By Dr. Steven Taylor @ 3:03 pm

Michelle at ASV points to this column by Albert Mohler, President of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville in which he argues against deliberate childlessness (in the context of marriage).

Obviously, I am pro-procreation; after all I have an average-busting three children, but I find myself rather unimpressed with Mohler’s piece and his argument. For one thing, he seems to inflate the movement towards childlessness and calls it an “epidemic.” This strikes me as clear hyperbole. Further, I think he makes some dubious theological and logical claims.

Let’s consider all of this.

Would life be easier without children? Yes.

Would life be cheaper without children? Heck yes.

Would my life be as rich? No.

Would I be the person I am now? No.

Might I be an idiot who thinks that having pets is the same as having kids. I suppose.

Still, having said all of that, I don’t accept the argument that one is required by the Christian faith to procreate

Yes, in Genesis 1:28 there is a commandment to “be fruitful and multiply�? but that is “in the beginning” (i.e., there are just the two people at that point in the story). The command is again given to Noah and his family post flood in Genesis 8:17. I don’t think you can take either as a generalized command. Context matters, you know. Even if it is a generalization command, in the current context, the human race is being fruitful and multiplying, but I do not see that the command could be construed as being specific to each human being.

Even the verse that Mohler cites doesn’t contain a command:

“Behold, children are a gift of the Lord, the fruit of the womb is a reward. Like arrows in the hand of a warrior, so are the children of one’s youth. How blessed is the man whose quiver is full of them; they will not be ashamed when they speak with their enemies in the gate.” [Psalm 127: 3-5]

Just because something is a blessing, doesn’t mean that God has commanded something to be. Although I am aware that some (incorrectly in my view) interpret this verse as to mean that we should all have a large number of children.

Heck, Paul writes that it is better not to marry in 1 Corinthians 7—so does that mean that we should aspire to that state? And was Paul ignoring the injunction to “be fruitful and multiply�? in Genesis?

Mohler states:

Couples are not given the option of chosen childlessness in the biblical revelation.

I don’t accept that conclusion, as there are childless married couples in the Bible, and there is nothing that I am aware of that directly commands all couples to procreate. It is often noted that being barren and wanting children was a sorrow, but I don’t see any condemnation on these people for their lack of children. Further, while he says the following “[t]hey rely on others to produce and sustain the generations to come�? he is ignoring the fact that the same charge could be leveled at people who remain unmarried and have no children. Given that Christ Himself never married this is a difficult argument to maintain logically, given that Mohler seems to want to argue that every human being has the responsibility to reproduce to help support the race. And even if you put Christ in a special category, you still have to explain the Apostle Paul and his statements in 1 Corinthians 7 (not to mention his life in general, which was childless).

Indeed, despite being a Baptist, Mohler’s arguments sound almost Catholic, insofar as taken to their logical extremes, contraception should be banned, and my wife and I are wrong to have stopped at only three children.

No, it seems to me that Mohler is allowing other views other than purely biblical ones to color his thinking. Indeed, Mohler seems a bit hung up on the idea that sex might be considered an end of itself, rather than a route to procreation. First, his assumption that such thinking is only a modern, post-sexual revolution phenomenon is simply false (read some history or literature pre-1960 and oddly, one will find that people have been having sex for the pleasure of sex for some time). Second, is he suggesting that once a married coupled has passed beyond child-bearing that sex ought to be shelved? I expect not.

His position doesn’t seem all that well thought out—indeed, it is more a response to what he sees as some shallow reasons not to have children than a very well constructed logical or theological argument against purposeful childlessness.

And yes, I do think that many people choose not to have children for selfish reasons, but I also think that if one doesn’t want children, better not to have them. As Mohler himself says “Parenthood is not a hobby�? so if one really doesn’t want to be a parent, perhaps it is best for all involved that one not become one.

Filed under: Parenting, Religion | |Send TrackBack

Arguing with signposts… » Childless linked with [...] gion ] What do you get when you mix Michele Catalano, Albert Mohler and Dr. Steven Taylor? Two against one. The results don’t look good for Dr. Mohler. I mostly agree with D [...]


  1. I like and respect Dr. Mohler, but am not sure I agree with him on this issue. (I give more thought to the “if you aren’t called to celebacy, get married” argument he makes, but Scripture supports that position more.)

    I think he’s looking at Christians more than non-believers here (at least, so he saith upon his blog - the man is one of the most prolific writers I’ve seen - check out if so inclined). I’m just not sure that deliberate childlessness is always a sin. However, when I do get married, I very much plan to have at least one child as soon as I can.

    Comment by B. Minich, PI — Wednesday, August 17, 2005 @ 4:54 pm

  2. The West is dying. We need more children. The 3rd World will take over the West in population in a few decades.

    Comment by patd95 — Wednesday, August 17, 2005 @ 5:31 pm

  3. Actually, the U.S. is NOT dying, as our birth rate is at least at the level of replacement. Western Europe is dying by the standards of native birth rates.

    And Mohler is known for making absolutist statements. That’s how he got to be president of Southern Baptist Seminary as a 32-year-old state baptist paper editor.

    Anyway, excellent response, Steve.

    Comment by Bryan S. — Wednesday, August 17, 2005 @ 9:28 pm

  4. patd95,
    I’m not sure where you are getting your numbers, but the 3rd World is already larger, in population, than the West. According to my source (Calvert & Calvert, Politics and Society in the Third World, 1996), “Three out of four [people] live in the Third World.” I think they passed us a long time ago.

    The argument I often hear is that the “wrong people” are having children. I don’t really think we want to go down that road. In my opinion, Pro-creation = good, eugenics = bad.

    Comment by Jan — Wednesday, August 17, 2005 @ 9:35 pm

  5. […] gion ]

    What do you get when you mix Michele Catalano, Albert Mohler and Dr. Steven Taylor? Two against one. The results don’t look good for Dr. Mohler. I mostly agree with D […]

    Pingback by Arguing with signposts… » Childless — Wednesday, August 17, 2005 @ 9:48 pm

  6. Good topic. I tend to agree with you on this one. I have five children-not because it was my duty-but because we like children, I would like to think we are good parents-Hollie and I both came from small families (our kids have ZERO cousins to play with-something I remember fondly growing up), etc.

    Is it hard? Yes. Expensive? Yes. Tense at times? Yes. Worth it? Yes, yes, yes, to us a hundred times yes.

    I do think a commentor above is correct is fearing our reducing procreation (in the West) is a negative-if you believe in Western Civilization and the fact that to preserve it you have to inculcate its values to future generations.

    One final and sensitive point about sex beng about pleasure or procreation. I think the Bible says both! Can I quote a racy verse out of the Bible here “A loving doe[your wife], a graceful deer— may her breasts satisfy you always, may you ever be captivated by her love.”
    Proverbs 5:19.

    Also, if you have ever read the book of Song of Solomon-there’s a lot about the pleasure of marriage-nothing I recall about child-bearing (although that can be a pleasure too).

    Comment by Bart Harmon — Friday, August 19, 2005 @ 9:37 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

The trackback url for this post is:

NOTE: I will delete any TrackBacks that do not actually link and refer to this post.

Leave a comment

Take a Look At This!

Visitors Since 2/15/03

PoliBlog is the Host site for:

A TTLB Community


Business Associates

Finance Answers

Health Benefits

Beach Homes

Car Shopping


Powered by WordPress