PoliBlog (TM): A Rough Draft of my Thoughts


RSS feed for comments on this post.

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.poliblogger.com/wp-trackback.php?p=10315

  1. And let’s face facts, most films (although granted, not all) would hardly be any different if a couple of f-bombs were removed or if they contained less T&A.

    Amen, brother! Case in point: Double Jeopardy, a recent thriller starring Ashley Judd. At the beginning of the movie, we get a softcore scene of Judd making love to her husband. Why? To establish that they were married? Uhhh, probably not.

    I’m fine with sex, violence, and profanity, when they’re necessary for the story. It’d be hard to make a thriller like, say, Klute, in which one of the main characters is a high-class prostitute, without having that character be frank about sex. However, that’s a lot different than (pardon my choice of words) sticking in a sex scene just because you think that you can’t get the 17 year-olds to watch a movie without seeing Ashley Judd’s bare bodkin.

    Comment by Kingdaddy — Sunday, July 9, 2006 @ 10:30 pm

  2. I do not see what the big deal is, especially when you see movies edited for content and language for TV all the time.

    Case in point: AMC had Scarface tonight, without one F-bomb!

    Comment by Mark — Sunday, July 9, 2006 @ 11:31 pm

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Close this window.

0.094 Powered by Wordpress