Click Here

Visit Bloomberg.com to get all the news, commentary and context you need. Content,video, alerts and podcasts. Online exclusives now available.

CATEGORIES
ARCHIVES
Look Who's Linking to PoliBlog:
3cx.org
Absinthe and Cookies
Accidental Verbosity
Admiral Quixote's Roundtable
All Day Permanent Red
All Things Jennifer
Ann Althouse
The American Mind
Arguing with signposts
Arms and influence
The Astute Blogger
Asymmeterical Information
Attaboy
augustus
B-Town Blog Boys
BabyTrollBlog
Backcountry Conservative
Balloon Juice
Bananas and Such Begging to Differ
The Bemusement Park
Benedict
Bewtween the Coasts
Betsy's Page
The Big Picture
BipolarBBSBlog
BIZBLOGGER
bLogicus
Blogs for Bush
The Blog of Daniel Sale
BoiFromTroy
Boots and Sabers
brykMantra
BushBlog
The Bully Pulpit
Cadillac Tight
Caffeinated Musing
California Yankee
Captain's Quarters
Chicago Report
Chicagoland of Confusion
Citizen Smash
Coldheartedtruth
Collected Thoughts
The Command Post
Common Sense and Wonder
Confessions Of A Political Junkie
The Conservative Philosopher
Conservative Revolution
Conservative and Right
Cranial Cavity
The Daily Lemon
Daly Thoughts
DANEgerus Weblog
Dart Frog on a Cactus
Dean's World Dear Free World
Brad DeLong
Democracy Project
DiVERSiONZ
The Disagreeable Conservative Curmudgeon
Down to the Piraeus
Drink this...
Earl's log
Earthly Passions
The Education Wonks
the evangelical outpost
exvigilare
Eye of the Storm
Feste
Filtrat
Firepower Forward
The Flying Space Monkey Chronicles
The Friendly Ghost
FringeBlog
Fruits and Votes
Functional, if not decorative
G-Blog.net
The Galvin Opinion
The Glittering Eye
Haight Speech
Half-Bakered
The Hedgehog Report
Heh. Indeed.
Hellblazer
Hennessy's View
High Desert Skeptic
The Hillary Project
History and Perceptions
Robert Holcomb
I love Jet Noise
Idlewild South
Incommunicado
Independent Thinker
Insults Unpunished
Interested-Participant
Internet Ronin
Ipse Dixit
It Can't Rain All The Time...
The Jay Blog
Jen Speaks
Joefish's Freshwater Blog
John Lemon
johnrpierce.info blog
Judicious Asininity
Jump In, The Water's Fine!
Just On The Other Side
KeepinItReal
A Knight's Blog
The Kudzu Files
LeatherPenguin
Let's Try Freedom
LibertarianJackass.com
Liberty Father
Life and Law
David Limbaugh
LittleBugler
Locke, or Demosthenes?
LostINto
Mad Minerva
Gary Manca
Mark the Pundit
Mediocre but Unexciting
memeorandum
Mental Hiccups
Miller's Time
Mind of Mog
Minorities For Bush
Mr. Hawaii
The Moderate Voice
The Modulator
Much Ado
Mungowitz End
My opinion counts
my thoughts, without the penny charge
My Word
mypetjawa
Naw
Neophyte Pundit
Neutiquam erro
New England Republican
NewsHawk Daily
neWs Round-Up
NixGuy.com
No Pundit Intended
Nobody asked me, but...
Obsidian Wings
Occam's Toothbrush
On the Fritz
On the Third Hand
One Fine Jay
Out of Context
Outside the Beltway
Suman Palit
Parablemania
Passionate America
Brian Patton
Peaktalk
Pelicanpost
Peppermint Patty
Phlegma
John Pierce
PiratesCove
Politicalman
The Politicker
The Politburo Diktat
Political Annotation
Political Blog For The Politically Incorrect
Possumblog
Power Politics
Powerpundit.com
Practical Penumbra
Priorities & Frivolities ProfessorBainbridge.com
Prof. Blogger's Pontifications
Pros and Cons
protein wisdom
PunditFilter
Pundit Heads
QandO
The Queen of All Evil
Quotes, Thoughts, and other Ramblings
Ramblings' Journal
Random Acts of Kindness
Random Nuclear Strikes
Ranting Rationalist
Read My Lips
Reagan Country
Red State Diaries
Jay Reding.com
A Republican's Blog
Resource.full
The Review
Rhett Write
Right Side of the Rainbow
Right Wingin-It
Right Wing News
Right Voices
Rightward Reasonings
riting on the wall
robwestcott
Rooftop Report
RoguePundit
The Sake of Argument
Sailor in the Desert
Scrappleface
Secular Sermons
Sha Ka Ree
Shaking Spears
She Who Will Be Obeyed!
The Skeptician
The Skewed
Slant/Point.
Slobokan's Site O' Schtuff
small dead animals
Sneakeasy's Joint
SoCal Law Blog
A Solo Dialogue
Solomonia
Some Great Reward
Southern Musings
Speed of Thought...
Spin Killer
Matthew J. Stinson
A Stitch in Haste
Stop the ACLU
The Strange Political Road Trip of Jane Q. Public
The Strata-Sphere
Stuff about
Suman Palit
SwimFinsSF
Target Centermass
Templar Pundit
The Temporal Globe
Tex the Pontificator
Texas Native
think about it...
Tiger
Tobacco Road Fogey
Toner Mishap
Tony Talks Tech
The Trimblog
Truth. Quante-fied.
Twenty First Century Republican
Unlocked Wordhoard
Use The Forks!!
Ut Humiliter Opinor
Varifrank
VietPundit
Vista On Current Events
VodkaPundit
Vox Baby
Jeff Vreeland's Blog
Wall of Sleep
Weapons of Mass Discussion
Who Knew?
The Window Manager
Winning Again!
WizBang!
WizBang Tech
The World Around You
The Yin Blog
You Big Mouth, You!
Zygote-Design
al.com - Alabama Weblogs

AJC's 2004 Election Politics Sites and Blogs
Campaign Finance
Welcome to newcounterculture.com World O' Blogs
WRKO-AM's "Political Junkies" list
Yahoo! Directory Political Weblogs
Young Elephant

Who Links Here

Wednesday, February 8, 2006
Legal Justification II: More on the AUMF
By Dr. Steven Taylor @ 6:19 am

Something else that occurred to me to add to my discussion on the Authorization to Use Military Force: Congress can giveth and the Congress can taketh away.

In other words: there is a certain illogic in slapping down the AUMF on the table and saying “see! You gave us the power to do this, so butt out!” If Congress authorized the power via the AUMF as the Attorney General has argued, then surely, by that logic, the Congress can take that power away, modify or oversee it however they wish. The notion that a vague clause in a resolution that was clearly aimed at action abroad creates some sort of legal fait accompli concerning any specific decision made by the administration under that resolution, especially one that is at least partially focused on domestic actions, is absurd.

As such, it doesn’t even make sense to continue to argue over the AUMF. Even if one accepts the argument that that piece of congressional actions could be construed as authorization, there is nothing that should stop Congress from clarifying what they meant.

From there the administration only has the “inherent Article II powers” argument to back up the assertion that everything is fine with the program.

6 Comments »

  1. Yes.

    To the extent that the issue concerns a dispute over congressional intent, the logical thing for Congress to do is *clarify its intent*. Sadly, that would require taking an actual stand on the merits of the intercept program, and Congress would apparently rather grandstand.

    I wonder if it would be worth calling my representatives to encourage them to pass a clarifying resolution? I almost don’t care whether they concur with the administration’s interpretation of the AUMF or reject it — just *settle* it so we can get back to more important issues.

    Comment by Kyle Haight — Wednesday, February 8, 2006 @ 11:19 am

  2. You are correct-the easiest route here would be for Congress to overtly clarify their position.

    Of course, part of the oversight issue is figuring out what it is that they would be clarifying about, so to speak.

    Comment by Dr. Steven Taylor — Wednesday, February 8, 2006 @ 11:44 am

  3. One small problem with the idea that Congress can take away or modify authority that it granted on 9/18/01: The president can veto any “clarification” passed by Congress.

    I thought at the time, and I still think, that the brief and expansive language of the AUMF was a shameful (and probably unconstitutional) abdication of congressional authority. That said, I don’t read this abdication of authority to grant the executive a right to undertake domestic surveillance outside of existing FISA authority.

    However, if former Sen. Daschle is not correct that the executive asked for, and Democrats refused to grant, explicit domestic authority in the AUMF, then I would have to agree that the AUMF is not clearly circumscribed, and the administration may not be as wrong (legally, that is) as I would like to believe.

    Comment by Matthew — Wednesday, February 8, 2006 @ 12:19 pm

  4. Matthew,

    True on the veto point.

    and even true on the legality issue vis-a-vis the AUMF. Of course, something can be legally ambiguous and be wrong. The legal ambiguity is part of why I don’t subscribe to the notion that we are in a constitutional crisis. I think that remains to be seen. Still, it behooves congress to seek better clarification of the situation than they have done to date.

    Comment by Dr. Steven Taylor — Wednesday, February 8, 2006 @ 1:05 pm

  5. It’s a constitutional crisis. A Big Time constitutional crisis. And it did not start the day someone had the good sense to leak the FISA violations…

    Comment by Matthew — Wednesday, February 8, 2006 @ 2:36 pm

  6. […] y Dr. Steven Taylor @ 7:12 pm

    (Part of a series of sorts: Previously: Part I, Part II, and Part III). This afternoon I was suffering surfing (although I think that was a Freudian typo) th […]

    Pingback by PoliBlog: A Rough Draft of my Thoughts » Legal Justification IV: FISA — Friday, February 10, 2006 @ 7:19 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

The trackback url for this post is: http://www.poliblogger.com/wp-trackback.php?p=9316

NOTE: I will delete any TrackBacks that do not actually link and refer to this post.

Leave a comment



Take a Look At This!
Inquiries
Blogroll


Visitors Since 2/15/03
---

PoliBlog is the Host site for:

A TTLB Community


Advertisement

Marketing cars
Office Linebacker
Baseball Shopping
Business Phones
Online Banking
Advertisement


Powered by WordPress