Click Here

Visit Bloomberg.com to get all the news, commentary and context you need. Content,video, alerts and podcasts. Online exclusives now available.

CATEGORIES
ARCHIVES
Look Who's Linking to PoliBlog:
3cx.org
Absinthe and Cookies
Accidental Verbosity
Admiral Quixote's Roundtable
All Day Permanent Red
All Things Jennifer
Ann Althouse
The American Mind
Arguing with signposts
Arms and influence
The Astute Blogger
Asymmeterical Information
Attaboy
augustus
B-Town Blog Boys
BabyTrollBlog
Backcountry Conservative
Balloon Juice
Bananas and Such Begging to Differ
The Bemusement Park
Benedict
Bewtween the Coasts
Betsy's Page
The Big Picture
BipolarBBSBlog
BIZBLOGGER
bLogicus
Blogs for Bush
The Blog of Daniel Sale
BoiFromTroy
Boots and Sabers
brykMantra
BushBlog
The Bully Pulpit
Cadillac Tight
Caffeinated Musing
California Yankee
Captain's Quarters
Chicago Report
Chicagoland of Confusion
Citizen Smash
Coldheartedtruth
Collected Thoughts
The Command Post
Common Sense and Wonder
Confessions Of A Political Junkie
The Conservative Philosopher
Conservative Revolution
Conservative and Right
Cranial Cavity
The Daily Lemon
Daly Thoughts
DANEgerus Weblog
Dart Frog on a Cactus
Dean's World Dear Free World
Brad DeLong
Democracy Project
DiVERSiONZ
The Disagreeable Conservative Curmudgeon
Down to the Piraeus
Drink this...
Earl's log
Earthly Passions
The Education Wonks
the evangelical outpost
exvigilare
Eye of the Storm
Feste
Filtrat
Firepower Forward
The Flying Space Monkey Chronicles
The Friendly Ghost
FringeBlog
Fruits and Votes
Functional, if not decorative
G-Blog.net
The Galvin Opinion
The Glittering Eye
Haight Speech
Half-Bakered
The Hedgehog Report
Heh. Indeed.
Hellblazer
Hennessy's View
High Desert Skeptic
The Hillary Project
History and Perceptions
Robert Holcomb
I love Jet Noise
Idlewild South
Incommunicado
Independent Thinker
Insults Unpunished
Interested-Participant
Internet Ronin
Ipse Dixit
It Can't Rain All The Time...
The Jay Blog
Jen Speaks
Joefish's Freshwater Blog
John Lemon
johnrpierce.info blog
Judicious Asininity
Jump In, The Water's Fine!
Just On The Other Side
KeepinItReal
A Knight's Blog
The Kudzu Files
LeatherPenguin
Let's Try Freedom
LibertarianJackass.com
Liberty Father
Life and Law
David Limbaugh
LittleBugler
Locke, or Demosthenes?
LostINto
Mad Minerva
Gary Manca
Mark the Pundit
Mediocre but Unexciting
memeorandum
Mental Hiccups
Miller's Time
Mind of Mog
Minorities For Bush
Mr. Hawaii
The Moderate Voice
The Modulator
Much Ado
Mungowitz End
My opinion counts
my thoughts, without the penny charge
My Word
mypetjawa
Naw
Neophyte Pundit
Neutiquam erro
New England Republican
NewsHawk Daily
neWs Round-Up
NixGuy.com
No Pundit Intended
Nobody asked me, but...
Obsidian Wings
Occam's Toothbrush
On the Fritz
On the Third Hand
One Fine Jay
Out of Context
Outside the Beltway
Suman Palit
Parablemania
Passionate America
Brian Patton
Peaktalk
Pelicanpost
Peppermint Patty
Phlegma
John Pierce
PiratesCove
Politicalman
The Politicker
The Politburo Diktat
Political Annotation
Political Blog For The Politically Incorrect
Possumblog
Power Politics
Powerpundit.com
Practical Penumbra
Priorities & Frivolities ProfessorBainbridge.com
Prof. Blogger's Pontifications
Pros and Cons
protein wisdom
PunditFilter
Pundit Heads
QandO
The Queen of All Evil
Quotes, Thoughts, and other Ramblings
Ramblings' Journal
Random Acts of Kindness
Random Nuclear Strikes
Ranting Rationalist
Read My Lips
Reagan Country
Red State Diaries
Jay Reding.com
A Republican's Blog
Resource.full
The Review
Rhett Write
Right Side of the Rainbow
Right Wingin-It
Right Wing News
Right Voices
Rightward Reasonings
riting on the wall
robwestcott
Rooftop Report
RoguePundit
The Sake of Argument
Sailor in the Desert
Scrappleface
Secular Sermons
Sha Ka Ree
Shaking Spears
She Who Will Be Obeyed!
The Skeptician
The Skewed
Slant/Point.
Slobokan's Site O' Schtuff
small dead animals
Sneakeasy's Joint
SoCal Law Blog
A Solo Dialogue
Solomonia
Some Great Reward
Southern Musings
Speed of Thought...
Spin Killer
Matthew J. Stinson
A Stitch in Haste
Stop the ACLU
The Strange Political Road Trip of Jane Q. Public
The Strata-Sphere
Stuff about
Suman Palit
SwimFinsSF
Target Centermass
Templar Pundit
The Temporal Globe
Tex the Pontificator
Texas Native
think about it...
Tiger
Tobacco Road Fogey
Toner Mishap
Tony Talks Tech
The Trimblog
Truth. Quante-fied.
Twenty First Century Republican
Unlocked Wordhoard
Use The Forks!!
Ut Humiliter Opinor
Varifrank
VietPundit
Vista On Current Events
VodkaPundit
Vox Baby
Jeff Vreeland's Blog
Wall of Sleep
Weapons of Mass Discussion
Who Knew?
The Window Manager
Winning Again!
WizBang!
WizBang Tech
The World Around You
The Yin Blog
You Big Mouth, You!
Zygote-Design
al.com - Alabama Weblogs

AJC's 2004 Election Politics Sites and Blogs
Campaign Finance
Welcome to newcounterculture.com World O' Blogs
WRKO-AM's "Political Junkies" list
Yahoo! Directory Political Weblogs
Young Elephant

Who Links Here

Friday, August 26, 2005
Now Roberts Hates Civil Rights
By Dr. Steven Taylor @ 8:11 am

Last week we had definitive proof that Roberts hates women and gender equity.

Now, via WaPp, we learn his support for civil rights is questionable: In Article, Roberts’s Pen Appeared to Dip South

When John G. Roberts Jr. prepared to ghostwrite an article for President Ronald Reagan a little over two decades ago, his pen took a Civil War reenactment detour.

The article, which was to appear in the scholarly National Forum journal, was called “The Presidency: Roles and Responsibilities.” Roberts was writing by hand a section on how the congressional appropriations process had evolved.

A fastidious editor of other people’s copy as well as his own, Roberts began with the words “Until about the time of the Civil War.” Then, the Indiana native scratched out the words “Civil War” and replaced them with “War Between the States.”

The handwritten document is one of tens of thousands of pages of Roberts files released over the past several weeks from his 1982-1986 tenure as an associate counsel to the president.

While it is true that the Civil War is also known as the War Between the States, the Encyclopedia Americana notes that the term is used mainly by southerners. Sam McSeveney, a history professor emeritus at Vanderbilt University who specialized in the Civil War, said that Roberts’s choice of words was significant.

“Many people who are sympathetic to the Confederate position are more comfortable with the idea of a ‘War Between the States,’ ” McSeveney explained. “People opposed to the civil rights movement of the 1960s and 1970s would undoubtedly be more comfortable with the words he chose.”

My general position on the Civil War should be well known to long-term readers, but for those who are new, have forgotten or chose not to read those posts, let me note: I am not sympathetic to those who wish to downplay the significance of slavery in the Civil War. I don’t buy the “it was about states’ rights” argument as a means of deflecting the slavery issue insofar as the chief right in question was the right to own slaves.

(As a side note, I also don’t buy the idea that every time someone mentions “states’ rights” that they are speaking in racist code)

Further, I do think that the term “Civil War” is ultimately more accurate in its overall connotation than “War Between the States.”

However, to bring this up in the context of the Roberts nomination, and to quote Professor McSeveny in a fashion that is supposed to raise the specter that Roberts is a closet racist who opposed the civil rights movement, it a tad, well, ridiculous.

And what is that headline supposed to mean? Are we being a tad condescending here, or what?

I will grant that the article goes on to provide an alternative explanation, but it seems quite clear, from the very fact that this piece of information was deemed worthy a story at all, that the reporter and editors and WaPo favor the anti-civil rights angle.

Here’s the alternative thesis:

John M. Coski, the historian and library director of the Museum of the Confederacy in Richmond, said the term was commonplace in the South until the 1960s or early 1970s. He said some people use “War Between the States” out of habit, others think it quaint or iconoclastic, and still others use it because they believe the Confederacy was right to secede.

“You can’t always draw the inference that someone who uses the term does so with an ideological intent, but at the same time you can’t be blind to the fact that some people do,” Coski said.

Given that Roberts was writing the article for Reagan, maybe he thought Reagan would have used the term. Who knows?

My question is: is this truly newsworthy?

h/t: E-mail from Anklebiting Pundits

Filed under: US Politics, Courts/the Judiciary | |Send TrackBack

ProfessorBainbridge.com linked with Is Roberts a Neo-Confederate?
PoliBlog: Politics is the Master Science » Slow News Monday linked with [...] itle: “Roberts Hate Bad Grammar!” — at least that makes it parallel with this and this). Via the NYT: In Re Grammar, Roberts’s Stance Is Crystal Clear In fact, an obsession wi [...]
A Knight’s Blog » More WaPo Idiocy on Roberts linked with [...] Roberts Filed under: Media, History — Paladin @ 9:00 am Poliblog has a great post on the latest Washington Post article on Roberts, who is apparently now a racist, white supremacist [...]

11 Comments »

  1. I would think there was some significance to the fact that he had written Civil War and changed it to say War Between the States. What that significance is, I couldn’t possibly say. Now, to the question “is this truly newsworthy?” Couldn’t we ask that of WAY TOO MANY news stories. Anything that a reporter or editor thinks that people might want to know is deemed newsworthy, the more it can be sensationalized, the better. I’m not saying it’s a good thing, but it is the world we live in and it isn’t going away.

    Comment by Jan — Friday, August 26, 2005 @ 8:29 am

  2. Now if he’d called if “The War Of Northern Aggression”….

    Comment by Harry — Friday, August 26, 2005 @ 8:36 am

  3. Granted, we live in information overload, and overall, I can’t, in all honesty, complain about too much information.

    What strikes me here is the clear (IMHO) political intent.

    Comment by Dr. Steven Taylor — Friday, August 26, 2005 @ 8:41 am

  4. I find this a ridiculous accusation leveled at an individual who seems to be a pretty good man. As far as the written word goes, those who have had any experience in writing academically are aware that word choice is often made based upon its aesthetic value. Perhaps “War Between the States” rolled off the pen a little better than “Civil War.”

    Comment by clint — Friday, August 26, 2005 @ 8:43 am

  5. […] Roberts
    Filed under: Media, History — Paladin @ 9:00 am

    Poliblog has a great post on the latest Washington Post article on Roberts, who is apparently now a racist, white supremacist […]

    Pingback by A Knight’s Blog » More WaPo Idiocy on Roberts — Friday, August 26, 2005 @ 9:00 am

  6. I agree with the commenter who mentioned “The War of Northern Aggression”. I’m not a fan of that term, but “War Between the States” has an interesting ring to it, and may not mean that the person who wrote it is an EVIL RACIST.

    Comment by B. Minich, PI — Friday, August 26, 2005 @ 10:33 am

  7. I always thought it was known as “the recent unpleasantness.”

    Comment by Ugh — Friday, August 26, 2005 @ 5:03 pm

  8. He was writing for Reagan, and perhaps he thought that “War Between the States” fit Reagan’s oratorical/lyrical style of writing and speaking.

    Comment by Teri — Friday, August 26, 2005 @ 11:02 pm

  9. Heya Doc, saw this one on Althouse too. I’m just amazed at how much effort the WaPo is putting into maligning Roberts every step of the way.

    The irony of it is that since this is the first nomination in “the internet age,” we’re beginning to see that all that information that is available to everyone may actually be less significant and more meaningless than what we ascribe to it.

    Comment by O.F. Jay — Saturday, August 27, 2005 @ 10:45 am

  10. Is Roberts a Neo-Confederate?

    Of course not, but SCOTUS nominee John Roberts’ increasingly desperate opponents have seized on a 1980s article:A fastidious editor of other people’s copy as well as his own, Roberts began with the words Until about the time of the Civil

    Trackback by ProfessorBainbridge.com — Saturday, August 27, 2005 @ 12:41 pm

  11. […] itle: “Roberts Hate Bad Grammar!” — at least that makes it parallel with this and this). Via the NYT: In Re Grammar, Roberts’s Stance Is Crystal Clear In fact, an obsession wi […]

    Pingback by PoliBlog: Politics is the Master Science » Slow News Monday — Monday, August 29, 2005 @ 6:27 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

The trackback url for this post is: http://www.poliblogger.com/wp-trackback.php?p=7966

NOTE: I will delete any TrackBacks that do not actually link and refer to this post.

Leave a comment



Take a Look At This!
Inquiries
Blogroll


Visitors Since 2/15/03
---

PoliBlog is the Host site for:

A TTLB Community


Advertisement

Marketing cars
Office Linebacker
Baseball Shopping
Business Phones
Online Banking
Advertisement


Powered by WordPress