Look Who's Linking to PoliBlog:
Absinthe and Cookies
Accidental Verbosity
Admiral Quixote's Roundtable
All Day Permanent Red
All Things Jennifer
Ann Althouse
The American Mind
Arguing with signposts
The Astute Blogger
Asymmeterical Information
B-Town Blog Boys
Backcountry Conservative
Balloon Juice
Bananas and Such Begging to Differ
The Bemusement Park
Bewtween the Coasts
Betsy's Page
The Big Picture
Blogs for Bush
Boots and Sabers
The Bully Pulpit
Caffeinated Musing
California Yankee
Captain's Quarters
Chicago Report
Chicagoland of Confusion
Citizen Smash
Collected Thoughts
The Command Post
Common Sense and Wonder
Confessions Of A Political Junkie
The Conservative Philosopher
Conservative Revolution
Conservative and Right
Cranial Cavity
The Daily Lemon
Daly Thoughts
DANEgerus Weblog
Dart Frog on a Cactus
Dean's World Dear Free World
Brad DeLong
Democracy Project
The Disagreeable Conservative Curmudgeon
Down to the Piraeus
Drink this...
Earl's log
Earthly Passions
The Education Wonks
the evangelical outpost
Eye of the Storm
The Flying Space Monkey Chronicles
The Friendly Ghost
Functional, if not decorative
The Galvin Opinion
The Glittering Eye
Haight Speech
The Hedgehog Report
Heh. Indeed.
Hennessy's View
High Desert Skeptic
History and Perceptions
Robert Holcomb
I love Jet Noise
Idlewild South
Independent Thinker
Insults Unpunished
Internet Ronin
Ipse Dixit
It Can't Rain All The Time...
The Jay Blog
Jen Speaks
Joefish's Freshwater Blog
John Lemon blog
Judicious Asininity
Just On The Other Side
The Kudzu Files
Let's Try Freedom
Liberty Father
Life and Law
David Limbaugh
Locke, or Demosthenes?
Mad Minerva
Gary Manca
Mark the Pundit
Mediocre but Unexciting
Mental Hiccups
Miller's Time
Mind of Mog
Minorities For Bush
Mr. Hawaii
The Moderate Voice
The Modulator
Much Ado
Mungowitz End
My opinion counts
my thoughts, without the penny charge
My Word
Neophyte Pundit
Neutiquam erro
New England Republican
NewsHawk Daily
neWs Round-Up
No Pundit Intended
Nobody asked me, but...
Obsidian Wings
Occam's Toothbrush
On the Fritz
On the Third Hand
One Fine Jay
Out of Context
Outside the Beltway
Suman Palit
Passionate America
Brian Patton
Peppermint Patty
John Pierce
The Politicker
The Politburo Diktat
Political Annotation
Political Blog For The Politically Incorrect
Power Politics
Practical Penumbra
Priorities & Frivolities
Prof. Blogger's Pontifications
Pundit Heads
The Queen of All Evil
Quotes, Thoughts, and other Ramblings
Ramblings' Journal
Random Acts of Kindness
Random Nuclear Strikes
Ranting Rationalist
Read My Lips
Reagan Country
A Republican's Blog
The Review
Right Side of the Rainbow
Right Wingin-It
Right Wing News
Right Voices
Rightward Reasonings
riting on the wall
Rooftop Report
The Sake of Argument
Secular Sermons
Sha Ka Ree
Shaking Spears
She Who Will Be Obeyed!
The Skeptician
The Skewed
Slobokan's Site O' Schtuff
small dead animals
Sneakeasy's Joint
SoCal Law Blog
A Solo Dialogue
Some Great Reward
Southern Musings
Speed of Thought...
Spin Killer
Matthew J. Stinson
A Stitch in Haste
The Strange Political Road Trip of Jane Q. Public
Stuff about
Suman Palit
Target Centermass
Templar Pundit
The Temporal Globe
Tex the Pontificator
Texas Native
think about it...
Tobacco Road Fogey
Toner Mishap
Tony Talks Tech
The Trimblog
Truth. Quante-fied.
Use The Forks!!
Vista On Current Events
Vox Baby
Jeff Vreeland's Blog
Wall of Sleep
Weapons of Mass Discussion
Who Knew?
The Window Manager
Winning Again!
WizBang Tech
The World Around You
The Yin Blog
You Big Mouth, You!
Non-Blogs Linking to PoliBlog: - Alabama Weblogs

AJC's 2004 Election Politics Sites and Blogs Campaign Finance
Welcome to World O' Blogs
Yahoo! Directory Political Weblogs
Young Elephant

Who Links Here

Tuesday, November 16, 2004
That BCS is Annoying, to Say the Least

By Steven Taylor @ 9:12 am

The BCS is quite annoying: | Texas inches up to 5th in BCS

It’s an all-too-familiar scenario for the Longhorns, who would be left out of the BCS party if the current standings hold up through the end of the regular season

Texas already knows how it feels to be fifth in the BCS standings and miss out. It happened last season when Kansas State’s upset of Oklahoma in the Big 12 title game sent Texas to the non-BCS Holiday Bowl.

Working against Texas this year is the new BCS stipulation that rewards a team from outside the six BCS conferences for finishing in the top six of the standings.

Mountain West Conference leader Utah only needs to remain in the top six to become the first non-BCS school ever to get an at-large bid under the BCS system. The Utes host 5-5 Brigham Young on Saturday.

California, currently fourth in the BCS rankings, could secure the other at-large bid with wins over Stanford and Southern Mississippi.

That would mean another disappointing BCS end for Texas, which would likely end up playing in the Cotton Bowl for the second time in three seasons.

It seems to me that the BCS Bowls should just take the top ranked teams in the nation and do away with the automatic conference winners. Really, it is ridiculous that this could happen (indeed, the system is designed this way):

the Big East champion gets an automatic bid into one of the four BCS bowls, and current leader Boston College (7-2) is ranked 21st in the BCS, 16 spots behind Texas.

Granted, if Texas would take care of business and beat OU, this would be moot. But just from the perspective of wanting to see the best match-ups in the bowls, surely taking the top 8 in the polls and letting them play would be better than how we do it. Of course, that smacks of a semi-playoff, and we can’t have that, now can we?

  • Arguing with signposts… » Yearly Reminder that College Football Needs a Playoff linked with a pingback

Click here to go to the main page.


The URI to TrackBack this entry is:

  1. Sorry, Professor, but when a team almost loses to KANSAS they have no business even being ranked fifth.

    Comment by Mark — Tuesday, November 16, 2004 @ 10:25 am

  2. Agreed.

    They should be renamed the Texas Panty Wastes!

    Comment by John Lemon — Tuesday, November 16, 2004 @ 10:36 am

  3. Did they beat them or not? That is the bottom line, pathetic as the fact that the game was so close was.

    But really: Boston College in a BCS bowl over any team ranked in the top ten? Giveth me a break.

    Comment by Steven Taylor — Tuesday, November 16, 2004 @ 10:42 am

  4. You are assuming they can win the thanksgiving game against A&M.

    Comment by David Besly A&M ‘90 — Tuesday, November 16, 2004 @ 12:52 pm

  5. Pretty much, yes ;)

    Granted: nothing is guaranteed, but A&M did lose to Baylor, for crying out loud. Plus, Texas is the better team.

    Granted: if UT loses, I will nothing to gripe about.

    Comment by Steven Taylor — Tuesday, November 16, 2004 @ 1:00 pm

  6. If UT loses, will you publicly come out and call the Longhorns a bunch of panty wastes?

    Comment by John Lemon — Tuesday, November 16, 2004 @ 4:56 pm

  7. I don’t know. BC beat Notre Dame,who beat the likely Big 10 winner and the likely SEC East winner.

    Comment by ATM — Tuesday, November 16, 2004 @ 9:44 pm

  8. I don’t know. Every year I root for a BCS screw-up. It brings us closer to a real playoff system. As it is now, every college team is a bunch of pantywaists who can’t handle an extra couple of games.

    And let’s face it, losing to Baylor is a badge of extreme dishonor.

    Comment by bryan — Wednesday, November 17, 2004 @ 10:30 pm

RSS feed for these comments.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>



Take a Look At This!
  • Tabloid News
  • Word of The Day
  • Chronograph Watches
  • Office Shredders
  • Cash Registers
  • Ricoh Fax Machines
  • IBM Typewriters
  • Copy Machines
  • UNIX Consulting
  • Web Design

Visitors Since 2/15/03

Powered by WordPress