ARCHIVES
CATEGORIES
Look Who's Linking to PoliBlog:
3cx.org
Absinthe and Cookies
Accidental Verbosity
Admiral Quixote's Roundtable
All Day Permanent Red
All Things Jennifer
Ann Althouse
The American Mind
Arguing with signposts
The Astute Blogger
Asymmeterical Information
Attaboy
augustus
B-Town Blog Boys
BabyTrollBlog
Backcountry Conservative
Balloon Juice
Bananas and Such Begging to Differ
The Bemusement Park
Bewtween the Coasts
Betsy's Page
The Big Picture
BipolarBBSBlog
bLogicus
Blogs for Bush
BoiFromTroy
Boots and Sabers
brykMantra
BushBlog
The Bully Pulpit
Caffeinated Musing
California Yankee
Captain's Quarters
Chicago Report
Chicagoland of Confusion
Citizen Smash
Coldheartedtruth
Collected Thoughts
The Command Post
Common Sense and Wonder
Confessions Of A Political Junkie
Conservative and Right
Cranial Cavity
The Daily Lemon
Daly Thoughts
DANEgerus Weblog
Dart Frog on a Cactus
Dean's World Dear Free World
Brad DeLong
Democracy Project
DiVERSiONZ
The Disagreeable Conservative Curmudgeon
Down to the Piraeus
Drink this...
Earthly Passions
The Education Wonks
the evangelical outpost
exvigilare
Eye of the Storm
Feste
Filtrat
The Flying Space Monkey Chronicles
The Friendly Ghost
FringeBlog
Functional, if not decorative
G-Blog.net
The Galvin Opinion
The Glittering Eye
Haight Speech
Half-Bakered
The Hedgehog Report
Heh. Indeed.
Hellblazer
Hennessy's View
High Desert Skeptic
Robert Holcomb
I love Jet Noise
Idlewild South
Incommunicado
Independent Thinker
Insults Unpunished
Interested-Participant
Internet Ronin
Ipse Dixit
It Can't Rain All The Time...
The Jay Blog
Jen Speaks
Joefish's Freshwater Blog
John Lemon
johnrpierce.info blog
Judicious Asininity
Just On The Other Side
The Kudzu Files
LeatherPenguin
Let's Try Freedom
LibertarianJackass.com
Liberty Father
Life and Law
LittleBugler
Locke, or Demosthenes?
LostINto
Gary Manca
Mark the Pundit
Mediocre but Unexciting
memeorandum
Mental Hiccups
Miller's Time
Mind of Mog
Minorities For Bush
Mr. Hawaii
The Moderate Voice
The Modulator
Much Ado
Mungowitz End
My opinion counts
my thoughts, without the penny charge
My Word
mypetjawa
Naw
Neophyte Pundit
New England Republican
NewsHawk Daily
neWs Round-Up
No Pundit Intended
Nobody asked me, but...
Obsidian Wings
Occam's Toothbrush
On the Fritz
On the Third Hand
One Fine Jay
Out of Context
Outside the Beltway
Parablemania
Peaktalk
Peppermint Patty
Phlegma
John Pierce
PiratesCove
The Politicker
The Politburo Diktat
Political Annotation
Political Blog For The Politically Incorrect
Possumblog
Power Politics
Powerpundit.com
Practical Penumbra
Priorities & Frivolities ProfessorBainbridge.com
Prof. Blogger's Pontifications
PunditFilter
Pundit Heads
QandO
The Queen of All Evil
Quotes, Thoughts, and other Ramblings
Ramblings' Journal
Random Acts of Kindness
Random Nuclear Strikes
Ranting Rationalist
Read My Lips
Reagan Country
Jay Reding.com
A Republican's Blog
Resource.full
The Review
Right Side of the Rainbow
Right Wingin-It
Right Wing News
Right Voices
Rightward Reasonings
riting on the wall
robwestcott
Rooftop Report
The Sake of Argument
Scrappleface
Secular Sermons
Sha Ka Ree
Shaking Spears
She Who Will Be Obeyed!
The Skeptician
The Skewed
Slant/Point.
small dead animals
Sneakeasy's Joint
SoCal Law Blog
A Solo Dialogue
Solomonia
Some Great Reward
Southern Musings
Speed of Thought...
Spin Killer
Matthew J. Stinson
The Strange Political Road Trip of Jane Q. Public
Stuff about
SwimFinsSF
Target Centermass
Templar Pundit
The Temporal Globe
Tex the Pontificator
Texas Native
think about it...
Tiger
Tobacco Road Fogey
Tony Talks Tech
The Trimblog
Use The Forks!!
Varifrank
VodkaPundit
Wall of Sleep
Weapons of Mass Discussion
Who Knew?
The Window Manager
Winning Again!
WizBang!
WizBang Tech
The World Around You
The Yin Blog
You Big Mouth, You!
Zygote-Design
Non-Blogs Linking to PoliBlog:
al.com - Alabama Weblogs

AJC's 2004 Election Politics Sites and Blogs Campaign Finance
Welcome to newcounterculture.com World O' Blogs
Yahoo! Directory Political Weblogs
Young Elephant
Wednesday, December 31, 2003
Dean Comments on Bush

By Steven Taylor @ 10:16 am

Dean has dubbed the Bush administration “the most dangerous administration in my lifetime.”

First, by what standard?

Second, Dean was alive during the Nixon administration, was he not? In terms of serious damage to the Republic, I think Tricky Dick was the most “dangerous” administration in some time, although I have a hard time describing any US president as “dangerous".

And this is somewhat ironic, given the facts on the ground, not to mention the criticisms from conservatives:

From Iraq to homeland security to public health, President Bush’s “reckless” habit of placing “ideology over facts” has resulted in “the most dangerous administration in my lifetime,” Democrat Howard Dean charged over the past two days.

Honestly, that is pretty hard to argue on any number of issues, including trade and health care policy, to name two. Not to mention the fact that if the President was blinded by ideology in his foreign policy, why haven’t we invaded Iran and North Korea (or Syria, for that matter)?

And you have to love this logic:

“If we are safer, how come we lost 10 more troops and raised the safety alert” to the orange level, Dean said Sunday night in Ankeny, Iowa.

“All the other Democrats pounced on me and beat me up and said how ignorant I was about foreign affairs,” he said. “I think most people in America agree with me today and it’s only two weeks later.”

Dean may have a stoic demeanor, but he clearly ain’t from the planet Vulcan.

Filed under: 2004 Campaign
  • Go Dubya! linked with Dean dissected

Click here to go to the main page.

12 Comments»

  1. I could make the argument that the Bush Administration is the most irresponsible in my lifetime, but “dangerous” is overdoing it. Although, after following Dean for awhile, I am not surprised at his hyperbole.

    I do see a danger mounting in this administration that is not the fault of Bush, but rather of our present view of the Executive Branch. I believe that the Legislative Branch (a branch any true conservative should prefer to be strong and healthy) is slowly giving power to the Executive Branch. Given our Constitutional framework, that is a dangerous thing.

    Comment by Anthony — Wednesday, December 31, 2003 @ 11:06 am

  2. In a polarized nation between conservative & liberal , this kind of rhetoric is common place. Since Dean was speaking to the caucus-goers in Iowa, he was speaking to the party faithful, who don’t think to highly of Bush.

    Let’s face it. Bush didn’t exactly win points in the sense department by speaking at Bob Jones university.

    Comment by Eric — Wednesday, December 31, 2003 @ 11:42 am

  3. Bush is every bit as dangerous as Tricky Dick… even more so with his conservative Supreme Court, a Republican Congress and the full and complete backing (financial and otherwise) of the entire military industrial complex.

    He lied blatantly to the American people to send our troops to war. This wasn’t no lie about rather or not he cheated on his wife..

    Bush’s lies are killing Americans while his rich corporate buddies profit off their blood while the bodies are still warm.

    Yes, Dean is right, if not understating it!

    Comment by dgid — Wednesday, December 31, 2003 @ 12:25 pm

  4. Yes, that radical right-wing SCOTUS which decided the BCRA case and the Texas sodomy case. They are oppressively conserative.

    And, of course, President Clinton, the UN and Europeans government (including those who did not support the war) all believed that Saddam had WMDS.

    Care to try again?

    Comment by Steven — Wednesday, December 31, 2003 @ 2:11 pm

  5. David Souter, a Bush appointee, was one of the 4 in the 5-4 Bush v. Gore decision.

    And, the legal reasoning in the Texas sodomy case was far from conservative, even if one could argue (as would I), that there was a liberty issue at hand. Indeed, the ruling was more libertarian than conservative. Indeed, it is rather hard to argue that it was in any way conservative.

    I think you need to review your history in regards to precisely where most of Iraq’s amr camwe from (Russia (USSR) and France)

    Plus, you are changing the subject: your initial claim was that it was all lies about WMDs, now you agree he had them?

    Comment by Steven — Friday, January 2, 2004 @ 8:46 pm

  6. How many of the 9 did Reagan and Bush appoint? Reagan named Renquist (a Nixon appointee) Cheif Justice; also O’Connor; Scalia; didn’t he appoint Kennedy, too? Bush took care of Souter; Thomas. That’s six, with one to spare for close votesSouter’s vote was for people to say “see Souter dissented.” Nice try…

    Bush said Iraq had WMD. Rather anyone believed Bush is irreleveant because Bush never showed any eveidence that Iraq HAD WMD. Never! Certainly not enough to get support of the majority of nations to go to war.

    Look at the historical record of the Reagan-Bush Administration. Most of what Saddam bought was financed by the US. Not to mention whatever the corporate arms and munitions manufacturers could sell or broker.

    When Saddam was ready to get his newly constructed nuclear power plant online in the early 80’s, the Israeli airfoce blew it to hell. Reagan scolded the Israelis, because US companies helped build it. Was Saddam a WMD back then?

    Donald Rumsfeld shook Saddam’s hand within the same time frame (3 decades) that he claimed the brutal dictator WAS a weapon of mass destruction. Why is that not an issue, in light of all the dead Americans that could have been spared if Rumsfeld just arrested Saddam in ‘83.

    Comment by digi — Saturday, January 3, 2004 @ 7:11 pm

  7. How many of the 9 did Reagan and Bush appoint? Reagan named Renquist (a Nixon appointee) Cheif Justice; also O’Connor; Scalia; didn’t he appoint Kennedy, too? Bush took care of Souter; Thomas. That’s six, with one to spare for close votesSouter’s vote was for people to say “see Souter dissented.” Nice try…

    Bush said Iraq had WMD. Rather anyone believed Bush is irreleveant because Bush never showed any eveidence that Iraq HAD WMD. Never! Certainly not enough to get support of the majority of nations to go to war.

    Look at the historical record of the Reagan-Bush Administration. Most of what Saddam bought was financed by the US. Not to mention whatever the corporate arms and munitions manufacturers could sell or broker.

    When Saddam was ready to get his newly constructed nuclear power plant online in the early 80’s, the Israeli airfoce blew it to hell. Reagan scolded the Israelis, because US companies helped build it. Was Saddam a WMD back then?

    Donald Rumsfeld shook Saddam’s hand within the same time frame (3 decades) that he claimed the brutal dictator WAS a weapon of mass destruction. Why is that not an issue, in light of all the dead Americans that could have been spared if Rumsfeld just arrested Saddam in ‘83.

    Comment by digi — Saturday, January 3, 2004 @ 7:12 pm

  8. How many of the 9 did Reagan and Bush appoint? Reagan named Renquist (a Nixon appointee) Cheif Justice; also O’Connor; Scalia; didn’t he appoint Kennedy, too? Bush took care of Souter; Thomas. That’s six, with one to spare for close votesSouter’s vote was for people to say “see Souter dissented.” Nice try…

    Bush said Iraq had WMD. Rather anyone believed Bush is irreleveant because Bush never showed any eveidence that Iraq HAD WMD. Never! Certainly not enough to get support of the majority of nations to go to war.

    Look at the historical record of the Reagan-Bush Administration. Most of what Saddam bought was financed by the US. Not to mention whatever the corporate arms and munitions manufacturers could sell or broker.

    When Saddam was ready to get his newly constructed nuclear power plant online in the early 80’s, the Israeli airfoce blew it to hell. Reagan scolded the Israelis, because US companies helped build it. Was Saddam a WMD back then?

    Donald Rumsfeld shook Saddam’s hand within the same time frame (3 decades) that he claimed the brutal dictator WAS a weapon of mass destruction. Why is that not an issue, in light of all the dead Americans that could have been spared if Rumsfeld just arrested Saddam in ‘83.

    Comment by digi — Saturday, January 3, 2004 @ 7:12 pm

  9. Please forgive the triple posts. I don’t know how I did that, sorry.

    Comment by digi — Saturday, January 3, 2004 @ 7:24 pm

  10. Are you seriously suggesting that Rumsfeld could have arrested Saddam in 83? That is rather hard to take seriously.

    Comment by Steven — Saturday, January 3, 2004 @ 8:37 pm

  11. I’m just telling you what Rumsfeld said. When asked where were the WMD, Rumsfeld answered “We got Saddam Hussein. He’s been a brutal dictator for three decades. He IS a weapon of mass destruction.”

    Now if Saddam has been a brutal dictator for three decades, and therfore a WMD, why did Reagan send Rumsfeld to meet Saddam in a cordial ceremony where Rumsfeld shook hands with Hussein, whom Rumsfeld says was a WMD? Wasn’t 1983 within the three decade time frame given by Rumsfeld?

    One way or another, Rumsfeld is trying to have it both ways, and in so doing has implecated himself and the Reagan-Bush Administration with coersion of a brutal dictator-a WMD.

    Can’t you see the irony?

    Comment by digi — Sunday, January 4, 2004 @ 1:13 pm

  12. There is some irony yes. However, we have dealt with any number of dictators over the years, and many of the crimes that led Rumsfeld to later brand Hussein a mass murderer hadn’t happen yet, although I would agree that in 83 he was still a brutal dictator, but at the time we saw him as the lesser of two evils vis-a-vis Iran. It is a common story, like or not, in or history. It is called living in an imperfect world.

    The part that I found ludicrous was the suggestion the Rummy should have arrested him in 83.

    Comment by Steven — Sunday, January 4, 2004 @ 2:48 pm

RSS feed for these comments.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


Take a Look At This!
  • Tabloid News
  • Word of The Day
  • Chronograph Watches
  • Office Shredders
  • Cash Registers
  • Ricoh Fax Machines
  • IBM Typewriters
  • Copy Machines
  • UNIX Consulting
  • Web Design
Inquiries
Blogroll


Visitors Since 2/15/03
---

Powered by WordPress