Look Who's Linking to PoliBlog:
Absinthe and Cookies
Accidental Verbosity
Admiral Quixote's Roundtable
All Day Permanent Red
All Things Jennifer
Ann Althouse
The American Mind
Arguing with signposts
The Astute Blogger
Asymmeterical Information
B-Town Blog Boys
Backcountry Conservative
Balloon Juice
Bananas and Such Begging to Differ
The Bemusement Park
Bewtween the Coasts
Betsy's Page
The Big Picture
Blogs for Bush
Boots and Sabers
The Bully Pulpit
Caffeinated Musing
California Yankee
Captain's Quarters
Chicago Report
Chicagoland of Confusion
Citizen Smash
Collected Thoughts
The Command Post
Common Sense and Wonder
Confessions Of A Political Junkie
Conservative and Right
Cranial Cavity
The Daily Lemon
Daly Thoughts
DANEgerus Weblog
Dart Frog on a Cactus
Dean's World Dear Free World
Brad DeLong
Democracy Project
The Disagreeable Conservative Curmudgeon
Down to the Piraeus
Drink this...
Earthly Passions
The Education Wonks
the evangelical outpost
Eye of the Storm
The Flying Space Monkey Chronicles
The Friendly Ghost
Functional, if not decorative
The Galvin Opinion
The Glittering Eye
Haight Speech
The Hedgehog Report
Heh. Indeed.
Hennessy's View
High Desert Skeptic
Robert Holcomb
I love Jet Noise
Idlewild South
Independent Thinker
Insults Unpunished
Internet Ronin
Ipse Dixit
It Can't Rain All The Time...
The Jay Blog
Jen Speaks
Joefish's Freshwater Blog
John Lemon blog
Judicious Asininity
Just On The Other Side
The Kudzu Files
Let's Try Freedom
Liberty Father
Life and Law
Locke, or Demosthenes?
Gary Manca
Mark the Pundit
Mediocre but Unexciting
Mental Hiccups
Miller's Time
Mind of Mog
Minorities For Bush
Mr. Hawaii
The Moderate Voice
The Modulator
Much Ado
Mungowitz End
My opinion counts
my thoughts, without the penny charge
My Word
Neophyte Pundit
New England Republican
NewsHawk Daily
neWs Round-Up
No Pundit Intended
Nobody asked me, but...
Obsidian Wings
Occam's Toothbrush
On the Fritz
On the Third Hand
One Fine Jay
Out of Context
Outside the Beltway
Peppermint Patty
John Pierce
The Politicker
The Politburo Diktat
Political Annotation
Political Blog For The Politically Incorrect
Power Politics
Practical Penumbra
Priorities & Frivolities
Prof. Blogger's Pontifications
Pundit Heads
The Queen of All Evil
Quotes, Thoughts, and other Ramblings
Ramblings' Journal
Random Acts of Kindness
Random Nuclear Strikes
Ranting Rationalist
Read My Lips
Reagan Country
A Republican's Blog
The Review
Right Side of the Rainbow
Right Wingin-It
Right Wing News
Right Voices
Rightward Reasonings
riting on the wall
Rooftop Report
The Sake of Argument
Secular Sermons
Sha Ka Ree
Shaking Spears
She Who Will Be Obeyed!
The Skeptician
The Skewed
small dead animals
Sneakeasy's Joint
SoCal Law Blog
A Solo Dialogue
Some Great Reward
Southern Musings
Speed of Thought...
Spin Killer
Matthew J. Stinson
The Strange Political Road Trip of Jane Q. Public
Stuff about
Target Centermass
Templar Pundit
The Temporal Globe
Tex the Pontificator
Texas Native
think about it...
Tobacco Road Fogey
Tony Talks Tech
The Trimblog
Use The Forks!!
Wall of Sleep
Weapons of Mass Discussion
Who Knew?
The Window Manager
Winning Again!
WizBang Tech
The World Around You
The Yin Blog
You Big Mouth, You!
Non-Blogs Linking to PoliBlog: - Alabama Weblogs

AJC's 2004 Election Politics Sites and Blogs Campaign Finance
Welcome to World O' Blogs
Yahoo! Directory Political Weblogs
Young Elephant
Tuesday, December 23, 2003
The NYT on Powell

By Steven Taylor @ 9:09 am

The NYT has an interesting piece of Secretary of State Colin Powell today (Powell Defends Diplomatic Role). The tone, like many pieces on Powell, focuses on the thesis that he is frustrated in his position.

An expression of this frustration comes from a quote from an interview the Secretary did with Foreign Affairs:

“U.S. strategy is widely accused of being unilateralist by design,” Mr. Powell wrote. “It isn’t. It is often accused of being imbalanced in favor of military methods. It isn’t. It is frequently described as being obsessed with terrorism and hence biased toward preemptive war on a global scale. It most certainly is not.”

The funny thing to me is that the tone of the article suggests that the problem at hand is that the rest of the Bush administration is the reason why Powell is upset. Indeed, through the last several years much of the press has been hellbent on setting up a Powell v. the Rest dichotomy in the administration (especially v. Rummy).

While I have no doubt that there are difference of policy opinion between Powell and other members of admin, I also think that Powell is a man of sufficient integrity that if he really was as disgruntled about Bush administration policy as many in the press clearly hope he is that he would have resigned by now. Certainly he wouldn’t have said many of the things he has said over the last several years.

Indeed, I would point out to the NYT that the reason that Powell is frustrated about the misperceptions of US diplomacy (especially vis-a-vis “unilateralism") is the insistence of the press to pretend like all the Bush administration has done is run around all by its lonesome beating people up, despite empirical evidence to the contrary.

Were I Powell, I’d be frustrated as well.

Indeed, I find many liberals/opponents of the President’s foreign policy to have this fantasy that Powell is really on their side-a lone voice of reason in a sea of foreign policy nuts in the White House. Again, I say, if that was the case, I find it hard to believe that he stayed this long. It isn’t like he couldn’t have found a graceful way to resign (like, for example, his cancer).

And you have to love the attempt at interpretation here:

Only rarely has Mr. Powell shed light on any interior dissatisfactions he may have experienced in three years. In a recent interview with The Washington Post, Mr. Powell volunteered that one of the things he most admired about one of his predecessors, George C. Marshall, was that he did not resign even after his advice not to recognize Israel in 1948 was rejected.

Does that mean, though, that Mr. Powell has even thought about resigning, such as when President Bush decided to go to war against Iraq? Not at all, his aides say. Mr. Powell all along believed that war was justified if Saddam Hussein continued to flout international demands to come clean with his weapons.

Although this seems to me to be reasonable:

“It is not as if he was against the war,” said an aide to Mr. Powell. “It is just that the war was not his priority. It was Rumsfeld’s and Cheney’s priority. Powell’s priority was to make sure the war was carried out in the right way.”

Filed under: US Politics

Click here to go to the main page.

1 Comment»

  1. One thing further to remember is that Powell is, above all, a good soldier. And soldiers take orders from their commander. His satisfaction or disatisfaction comes second. Does that mean he is dissatisfied or satisfied? I don’t think anyone really knows. And because we don’t know, he becomes an enigma. And when someone of high stature is an enigma, speculates on his leanings.

    My personal take is that Powell is tired of this job, not necessarily frustrated, just tired. And he’ll be gone shortly after if Bush is reelected.

    Comment by Eric — Tuesday, December 23, 2003 @ 10:53 am

RSS feed for these comments.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>



Take a Look At This!
  • Tabloid News
  • Word of The Day
  • Chronograph Watches
  • Office Shredders
  • Cash Registers
  • Ricoh Fax Machines
  • IBM Typewriters
  • Copy Machines
  • UNIX Consulting
  • Web Design

Visitors Since 2/15/03

Powered by WordPress