Look Who's Linking to PoliBlog:
Absinthe and Cookies
Accidental Verbosity
Admiral Quixote's Roundtable
All Day Permanent Red
All Things Jennifer
Ann Althouse
The American Mind
Arguing with signposts
Asymmeterical Information
B-Town Blog Boys
Backcountry Conservative
Balloon Juice
Bananas and Such Begging to Differ
The Bemusement Park
Bewtween the Coasts
Betsy's Page
The Big Picture
Blogs for Bush
Boots and Sabers
The Bully Pulpit
Caffeinated Musing
California Yankee
Captain's Quarters
Chicago Report
Chicagoland of Confusion
Citizen Smash
Collected Thoughts
The Command Post
Common Sense and Wonder
Confessions Of A Political Junkie
Conservative and Right
Cranial Cavity
The Daily Lemon
Daly Thoughts
DANEgerus Weblog
Dart Frog on a Cactus
Dean's World Dear Free World
Brad DeLong
The Disagreeable Conservative Curmudgeon
Down to the Piraeus
Drink this...
Earthly Passions
The Education Wonks
the evangelical outpost
Eye of the Storm
The Flying Space Monkey Chronicles
The Friendly Ghost
Functional, if not decorative
The Galvin Opinion
The Glittering Eye
Haight Speech
The Hedgehog Report
Heh. Indeed.
Hennessy's View
High Desert Skeptic
Robert Holcomb
I love Jet Noise
Idlewild South
Independent Thinker
Insults Unpunished
Internet Ronin
Ipse Dixit
It Can't Rain All The Time...
The Jay Blog
Jen Speaks
Joefish's Freshwater Blog
John Lemon blog
Judicious Asininity
The Kudzu Files
Liberty Father
Life and Law
Locke, or Demosthenes?
Gary Manca
Mark the Pundit
Mediocre but Unexciting
Mental Hiccups
Miller's Time
Mind of Mog
Minorities For Bush
Mr. Hawaii
The Moderate Voice
The Modulator
Much Ado
My opinion counts
my thoughts, without the penny charge
My Word
Neophyte Pundit
New England Republican
neWs Round-Up
No Pundit Intended
Nobody asked me, but...
Obsidian Wings
Occam's Toothbrush
On the Fritz
On the Third Hand
One Fine Jay
Out of Context
Outside the Beltway
Peppermint Patty
John Pierce
The Politicker
The Politburo Diktat
Political Annotation
Political Blog For The Politically Incorrect
Power Politics
Practical Penumbra
Priorities & Frivolities
Prof. Blogger's Pontifications
Pundit Heads
The Queen of All Evil
Quotes, Thoughts, and other Ramblings
Ramblings' Journal
Random Acts of Kindness
Random Nuclear Strikes
Ranting Rationalist
Read My Lips
Reagan Country
A Republican's Blog
The Review
Right Side of the Rainbow
Right Wingin-It
Right Wing News
Right Voices
Rightward Reasonings
riting on the wall
Rooftop Report
The Sake of Argument
Secular Sermons
Sha Ka Ree
She Who Will Be Obeyed!
The Skeptician
The Skewed
small dead animals
Sneakeasy's Joint
SoCal Law Blog
A Solo Dialogue
Southern Musings
Speed of Thought...
Spin Killer
Matthew J. Stinson
The Strange Political Road Trip of Jane Q. Public
Stuff about
Target Centermass
Templar Pundit
The Temporal Globe
Tex the Pontificator
Texas Native
think about it...
Tobacco Road Fogey
Tony Talks Tech
The Trimblog
Use The Forks!!
Wall of Sleep
Weapons of Mass Discussion
Who Knew?
The Window Manager
WizBang Tech
The World Around You
The Yin Blog
You Big Mouth, You!
Non-Blogs Linking to PoliBlog: - Alabama Weblogs

AJC's 2004 Election Politics Sites and Blogs Campaign Finance
Welcome to World O' Blogs
Yahoo! Directory Political Weblogs
Young Elephant
Thursday, December 18, 2003
One of the Reasons Dems Have Problems

By Steven Taylor @ 10:20 am

Tina Brown’s piece in WaPo underscores part of the reason why the Democrats are staring at several more years of minority status: they constantly mis-interpret the reason that Republicans win. Instead of deailing with (Heaven forbid!) actual policy differences, Brown argues that the reason Reps are winning because the public likes stereotypical masculine types these days. She compares Bush to come a “comic-strip” hero and a “a guy in a sports bar” and quotes a progressive academic regarding the Schwarzenegger win:

as Berkeley professor George Lakoff, author of “Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think,” pointed out to me last week in Los Angeles, Jay Leno is a celebrity, too, and he wouldn’t have had a chance. Lakoff is a bearded, articulate progressive who has done a lot of work on the framing of winning issues. He stresses that Arnold was sponsored by Republican kingmakers because he’s a fantasy figure who very clearly represents the strict, punishing father people turn to in times of fear.

What about the very real possibility that voters were truly unhappy with Gray Davis, and that none of the other candidates were able to convince the voters that they were the best alternative. Obviously the election had nothing to do with the lackluster campaign of Busamante (who simply offered more Gray Davis) or the overly-conservative (for CA) message of McClintock (not to mention the shrillness of Huffingotn). No, it was the deep-seeded need for an authoritarian father figure that led to the outcome.

And the only reason Bush is President is because he says tough-guy things like “Bring ‘em on.” It has nothing to do with the weakness of the Democratic field, nor of the dearth of actual arguments against the President’s policies (and no, just saying “Bush is bad at X” is not an argument).

If the intelligensia of the Democratic Party continues to think this way (and especially if their candidates, both at the Presidential and Congressional levels, continue to campaign this way), then they can look forward to another decade of minority status in the Congress, and at least four more years getting into the White House only via the tourist line.

Filed under: 2004 Campaign

Click here to go to the main page.


  1. Uh, let’s see. Nope, no democrat I know believes any of this clap trap. Great fiction.

    I love it when the other side believes their own PR.

    Comment by Hal — Thursday, December 18, 2003 @ 11:43 am

  2. Hal,

    Tina Brown isn’t a Republican. Plus, try reading some of the stuff that Democrat-leaning pundits write.

    And are you really going to argue that the Democratic Party has done an excellent job of getting their message out?


    Comment by Steven — Thursday, December 18, 2003 @ 11:56 am

  3. This kind of thinking will have very little, if any play on the next election. Here’s why Bush will win the next election:

    There’s an old adage that countries go to war to distract the populous from the internal problems. There’s a corollary that says countries that are at war don’t focus on internal problems.

    The real reason Bush will win in ‘04 is because Iraq will continue to dominate the headlines next year. Dean’s going to have a real hard time getting air play on much of anything else.
    And since we won the Iraq war, Bush wins.

    Comment by Eric — Thursday, December 18, 2003 @ 12:00 pm

  4. Did anyone else note the extraneous bit about him having a beard?

    Lakoff is a bearded, articulate progressive who has done a lot of work on the framing of winning issues.

    What does having a beard have to do with anything? some of the most conservative people I know have beards. She could have just as easily left that out and it would have changed the point not one whit.


    Comment by bryan — Thursday, December 18, 2003 @ 9:34 pm

RSS feed for these comments.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>



Take a Look At This!
  • Tabloid News
  • Word of The Day
  • Chronograph Watches
  • Office Shredders
  • Cash Registers
  • Ricoh Fax Machines
  • IBM Typewriters
  • Copy Machines
  • UNIX Consulting
  • Web Design

Visitors Since 2/15/03

Powered by WordPress