Steven J. Duffield of the Senate Republican Policy Committee e-mails to inform that Senator Frist has proposed a compromise to the Democrats.
The outline is as follows:
Guaranteed up or down votes on judicial nominations· Circuit Court and Supreme Court nominees will receive an up or down vote on the U.S. Senate floor.
· District Court nominees unaffected—no current problem.
Guaranteed debate time on judicial nominations.
· Up to 100 hours of debate.
· Allows all members an opportunity to have their say.
· This length of debate time was available for members post-cloture until 1986.
Guaranteed reporting from Judiciary Committee to floor.
· Process to ensure nominees come to the floor.
· Sen. Arlen Specter “protocols� are model.
· Committee serves critical investigative and oversight process, and that will continue.
Guaranteed fairness for Senators and nominees.
· No blockade at Committee.
· Full and comprehensive debate.
· Up or down vote on the Senate floor.
Guaranteed protection of the legislative filibuster.
· No changes for legislative matters—all rights of U.S. Senators for legislation preserved.
My guess is that Democrats will be unimpressed, as it really is an agreement for them to disarm in return for 100 hours of debate, something that they theoretically already would have post-cloture. I am not certain really, what the Democrats would gain from this (but I have not fully digested it all yet).
Still, this sets the stage for a rules change if the Democrats reject the offer.
Sphere: Related Content
Frist sets the stage
In what is probably a move to set the stage for a vote on ending the judicial filibuster, Senate Majority Leader Frist has laid out a compromise for the Dems to digest on the battle over judicial nominations. Essentially, the…
Trackback by ConservativeOutpost.com — Thursday, April 28, 2024 @ 2:15 pm
Frist Compromise: More Debate Time But No Filibuster
At least we know this: despite on-again-off-again announcements about whether Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist and Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid are still talking to try and head off the “nuclear option” that would ban filibusters on judicial no…
Trackback by The Moderate Voice — Thursday, April 28, 2024 @ 4:36 pm
Shouldn’t the part about the legislative filibuster have read:
“No changes for legislative matters—all rights of U.S. Senators for legislation preserved, until such time as the majority tires of the minority’s obstructionism”
Comment by Jim — Thursday, April 28, 2024 @ 6:48 pm