CATEGORIES
Look Who's Linking to PoliBlog:
3cx.org
Absinthe and Cookies
Accidental Verbosity
Admiral Quixote's Roundtable
All Day Permanent Red
All Things Jennifer
Ann Althouse
The American Mind
Arguing with signposts
Arms and influence
The Astute Blogger
Asymmeterical Information
Attaboy
augustus
B-Town Blog Boys
BabyTrollBlog
Backcountry Conservative
Balloon Juice
Bananas and Such Begging to Differ
The Bemusement Park
Benedict
Bewtween the Coasts
Betsy's Page
The Big Picture
BipolarBBSBlog
BIZBLOGGER
bLogicus
Blogs for Bush
The Blog of Daniel Sale
BoiFromTroy
Boots and Sabers
brykMantra
BushBlog
The Bully Pulpit
Cadillac Tight
Caffeinated Musing
California Yankee
Captain's Quarters
Chicago Report
Chicagoland of Confusion
Citizen Smash
Coldheartedtruth
Collected Thoughts
The Command Post
Common Sense and Wonder
Confessions Of A Political Junkie
The Conservative Philosopher
Conservative Revolution
Conservative and Right
Cranial Cavity
The Daily Lemon
Daly Thoughts
DANEgerus Weblog
Dart Frog on a Cactus
Dean's World Dear Free World
Brad DeLong
Democracy Project
DiVERSiONZ
The Disagreeable Conservative Curmudgeon
Down to the Piraeus
Drink this...
Earl's log
Earthly Passions
The Education Wonks
the evangelical outpost
exvigilare
Eye of the Storm
Feste
Filtrat
Firepower Forward
The Flying Space Monkey Chronicles
The Friendly Ghost
FringeBlog
Fruits and Votes
Functional, if not decorative
G-Blog.net
The Galvin Opinion
The Glittering Eye
Haight Speech
Half-Bakered
The Hedgehog Report
Heh. Indeed.
Hellblazer
Hennessy's View
High Desert Skeptic
The Hillary Project
History and Perceptions
Robert Holcomb
I love Jet Noise
Idlewild South
Incommunicado
Independent Thinker
Insults Unpunished
Interested-Participant
Internet Ronin
Ipse Dixit
It Can't Rain All The Time...
The Jay Blog
Jen Speaks
Joefish's Freshwater Blog
John Lemon
johnrpierce.info blog
Judicious Asininity
Jump In, The Water's Fine!
Just On The Other Side
KeepinItReal
A Knight's Blog
The Kudzu Files
LeatherPenguin
Let's Try Freedom
LibertarianJackass.com
Liberty Father
Life and Law
David Limbaugh
LittleBugler
Locke, or Demosthenes?
LostINto
Mad Minerva
Gary Manca
Mark the Pundit
Mediocre but Unexciting
memeorandum
Mental Hiccups
Miller's Time
Mind of Mog
Minorities For Bush
Mr. Hawaii
The Moderate Voice
The Modulator
Much Ado
Mungowitz End
My opinion counts
my thoughts, without the penny charge
My Word
mypetjawa
Naw
Neophyte Pundit
Neutiquam erro
New England Republican
NewsHawk Daily
neWs Round-Up
NixGuy.com
No Pundit Intended
Nobody asked me, but...
Obsidian Wings
Occam's Toothbrush
On the Fritz
On the Third Hand
One Fine Jay
Out of Context
Outside the Beltway
Suman Palit
Parablemania
Passionate America
Brian Patton
Peaktalk
Pelicanpost
Peppermint Patty
Phlegma
John Pierce
PiratesCove
Politicalman
The Politicker
The Politburo Diktat
Political Annotation
Political Blog For The Politically Incorrect
Possumblog
Power Politics
Powerpundit.com
Practical Penumbra
Priorities & Frivolities ProfessorBainbridge.com
Prof. Blogger's Pontifications
Pros and Cons
protein wisdom
PunditFilter
Pundit Heads
QandO
The Queen of All Evil
Quotes, Thoughts, and other Ramblings
Ramblings' Journal
Random Acts of Kindness
Random Nuclear Strikes
Ranting Rationalist
Read My Lips
Reagan Country
Red State Diaries
Jay Reding.com
A Republican's Blog
Resource.full
The Review
Rhett Write
Right Side of the Rainbow
Right Wingin-It
Right Wing News
Right Voices
Rightward Reasonings
riting on the wall
robwestcott
Rooftop Report
RoguePundit
The Sake of Argument
Sailor in the Desert
Scrappleface
Secular Sermons
Sha Ka Ree
Shaking Spears
She Who Will Be Obeyed!
The Skeptician
The Skewed
Slant/Point.
Slobokan's Site O' Schtuff
small dead animals
Sneakeasy's Joint
SoCal Law Blog
A Solo Dialogue
Solomonia
Some Great Reward
Southern Musings
Speed of Thought...
Spin Killer
Matthew J. Stinson
A Stitch in Haste
Stop the ACLU
The Strange Political Road Trip of Jane Q. Public
The Strata-Sphere
Stuff about
Suman Palit
SwimFinsSF
Target Centermass
Templar Pundit
The Temporal Globe
Tex the Pontificator
Texas Native
think about it...
Tiger
Tobacco Road Fogey
Toner Mishap
Tony Talks Tech
The Trimblog
Truth. Quante-fied.
Twenty First Century Republican
Unlocked Wordhoard
Use The Forks!!
Ut Humiliter Opinor
Varifrank
VietPundit
Vista On Current Events
VodkaPundit
Vox Baby
Jeff Vreeland's Blog
Wall of Sleep
Weapons of Mass Discussion
Who Knew?
The Window Manager
Winning Again!
WizBang!
WizBang Tech
The World Around You
The Yin Blog
You Big Mouth, You!
Zygote-Design
Non-Blogs Linking to PoliBlog:
The Blogging Political Scientists Census-Beta Version can be found here.
Thursday, February 10, 2024
On Tenure and Academic Freedom
By Dr. Steven Taylor @ 10:59 am

This whole Ward Churchill situation has raised some interesting discussion about the professoriate and, specifically, about tenure and academic freedom.

Many have expressed on my blog (and elsewhere) a great deal of contempt and skepticism about the tenure system at American universities. While I will admit to being biased in favor of the tenure system, given that I am a beneficiary thereof and have worked for almost a decade and a half (if one includes grad school and my teaching career) to achieve that goal, I can understandably be in favor of the system.

However, I have given this a great deal of though to this issue and I remain unconvinced that there is a viable alternative to this system if we want to protect academic freedom. The only way to protect the free flow of ideas is to create an environment in which one cannot be dismissed for those ideas. The basic issue for me is that I don’t trust anyone to be the arbiter of what a “good” idea is versus a “bad” one. In whom should we vest this authority? The only means, in an open society, for determining a bad idea should be reasoned discourse and the application of reason. If arbitrary power is used to determine the value of an idea then the very concept of an open society has to be called into question.

Do we want honest discourse or not? Or do we only want to hear ideas that confirm our own beliefs? Surely we are all ultimately better off with a free and open exchange of ideas.

If professors believe that there is a chance that they can be fired for what they write and say, they will say and write less. Certainly they will shy away from anything that might create controversy (and this would be true not just in social sciences and related fields, but in the hard sciences as well).

For example: I have a column coming out in the Mobile Register this coming weekend in which I argue that a Roy Moore governorship would be bad for the state of Alabama (indeed, I think it would set the state back rather considerably). Now, this is likely to annoy a good number of Alabama taxpayers (Moore does have a 72% approval rating amongst Republicans in the state) and it is wholly possible that I will end up offending the man who will be governor of this state. Nonetheless I honestly believe that it is against the interest of the state to elect the man and wrote a column to that effect (and have blogged the fact and will likely state that fact in a number of public fora between now and next year). I see it as a public duty to express this opinion, not because I think that everyone should agree with me (although that would be nice, I suppose) but rather that because I view my role as a university professor and political analyst to share my views. I have what I think are analytically sound reasons for my position and clearly they aren’t partisan, per se, as it is pretty obvious to anyone who reads my blog that I vote predominantly for Republicans.

Am I failing to serve the taxpayers of Alabama if I am disagreeing with a large percentage of them? Should I only write that which is in conformity with general public opinion?

And, no, I never tell my students how to vote, nor would I ever grade anything based on the partisan view of a student.

Still, if I didn’t have tenure I would be an idiot to risk my job by publicly criticizing a potentially very powerful man. Do we really want a system in which people who are allegedly supposed to be thinking and talking about a host of issues are scared of the politiclly powerful?

So here’s the bottom line, in the form of a few questions:

1) Do we want a system in which the power to determine what thoughts and statements are “good” and what statements are “bad” is given to specific people? And, if so, who gets this power and why? Further, who then watches the watchmen? I honestly can’t understand why this wouldn’t be a frightening concept to all who value an open society.

2) Do we want a system in which a true, but controversial, idea if uttered or written can result in the firing of a professor?

3) Do we want a system in which professors have to worry about what powerful people think of them and their ideas?

To me, I can think of no reason to want any of these things, but then again, perhaps my readers disagree. And if one does find any of these possibilities to be troubling, can someone tell me about a better protection than the tenure system?

I again recommend the reading of J. S. Mill’s On Liberty.

Additionally: Calls for the diminution of certain rights almost always come as the result of some behavior that is sufficiently outside accepted norms that the general public finds the punishment of that behavior to be acceptable. However, such willingness to siphon rights tends to have the more important effect of enhancing the power of government. This is not a good trade off. I would rather let the Nazis march in Skokie than hae the government acquire the power determine which groups and causes are acceptable and which are not.

The only way to guarantee my basic rights to worship, speak, associate and so forth is to be willing to allow your rights to similarly be protected. If I am willing to surrend your rights to some arbitrary power, how long before my rights are the target of that same decision-maker?

Filed under: Academia | |Send TrackBack

Outside The Beltway linked with Beltway Traffic Jam
PoliBlog: Politics is the Master Science » Gingrich on Churchill and Tenure linked with [...] as nothing to do with public pressure. Setting aside the issue, for a moment of whether tenure is a good thing or not, I find Gingrich’s stance to be stunning. Yes, Ward Churchill ha [...]

9 Comments »

  • el
  • pt
    1. Good post Steven.

      One other misconception that people have about universities and the academy is that professors are not evaluated on performance.

      At every university, faculty have to consistently do annual reports, which are usually evaluated by a peer committee, department chair, dean, and provost. Usually merit pay is tied to the evaluation of these reports, giving even tenured profs incentive to perform well.

      Comment by Kappiy — Thursday, February 10, 2024 @ 11:13 am

    2. Agreed all around. Of course, most of those arguments could be made for junior professors without tenure, too. Indeed, those are the guys most likely to need protection and the ones likeliest to be prolific writers/speakers.

      Comment by James Joyner — Thursday, February 10, 2024 @ 11:15 am

    3. It seems to me that the tenure system trades a protection against outside meddling for at least some degree of expected conformaty inside; to get tenure, you have to gain the approval of your colleagues–and I suspect for most professors, the threat of a governor or state legislator calling for their heads is significantly less than the threat from within.

      Comment by Chris Lawrence — Thursday, February 10, 2024 @ 11:16 am

    4. Technically one has academic freedom even if one doesn’t have tenure. Of course, one is still more prone to not believe that fact in the pre-tenure years than in the post-tenure ones.

      There are clearly issues with those pre-tenure years, at least part of which cause the conformity issue that Chris notes.

      It is hardly a perfect system–I am just not sure as to what alternative could be constructed.

      Comment by Steven Taylor — Thursday, February 10, 2024 @ 11:19 am

    5. Tenure is required for the left and right of professors. My boss is from the left and I am generally from the right. I do not believe he holds this against me on the other hand having tenure gives me the right to say some things I could not say. Most importantly it allows me to be honest in class. Without tenure we might have to teach in a safe dishonest way–something I will never do.

      Comment by Mark — Thursday, February 10, 2024 @ 12:05 pm

    6. As someone who works at a school without tenure, I can attest to your hypothesis related to what would happen without tenure.

      Comment by bryan — Thursday, February 10, 2024 @ 12:09 pm

    7. Beltway Traffic Jam
      The daily linkfest:

      Steven Taylor explains, again, why tenure for university professors is a good idea.
      Jeff Goldstein imagines Janeane Garofalo getting a letter with a Reagan stamp on it.
      Kevin McGehee is begging for participants in his capti…

      Trackback by Outside The Beltway — Thursday, February 10, 2024 @ 3:06 pm

    8. Yeah, I don’t know that there’s a better alternative to tenure (the other Churchill’s quote applies here); although, in self-interested terms, I at least wouldn’t have a bunch of people coming on campus to try to get the tenure-track job doing exactly what I do now. :-)

      Comment by Chris Lawrence — Thursday, February 10, 2024 @ 5:07 pm

    9. […] as nothing to do with public pressure. Setting aside the issue, for a moment of whether tenure is a good thing or not, I find Gingrich’s stance to be stunning. Yes, Ward Churchill ha […]

      Pingback by PoliBlog: Politics is the Master Science » Gingrich on Churchill and Tenure — Friday, February 25, 2024 @ 8:07 pm

    RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

    The trackback url for this post is: http://poliblogger.com/wp-trackback.html?p=6198

    NOTE: I will delete any TrackBacks that do not actually link and refer to this post.

    Leave a comment



    Blogroll


    Visitors Since 2/15/03
    ---

    PoliBlog is the Host site for:

    A TTLB Community


    Advertisement

    Computer Deals

    Online Security

    Camaro parts

    Vintage Triumph

    Landscaping Services

    Advertisement


    Powered by WordPress