If you wanted to have flings (allegedly) with pancake house waitresses, reality TV participants, and porn stars (to name only three),1 why in the world did you get married?
On the one hand, this is an old story being retold yet again, and on the other it has the clear feel of truth being far stranger than fiction/the “stuff you can’t make up file.”
- Not that I would recommend such a lifestyle. [↩]
Filed under: Uncategorized | Comments/Trackbacks (3)|
The views expressed in the comments are the sole responsibility of the person leaving those comments. They do not reflect the opinion of the author of PoliBlog, nor have they been vetted by the author.
December 7th, 2009 at 2:28 pm
[...] was writing a brief, semi-joking post at my place about the one question I have for Tiger Woods and it made me think of a quick item I had posted here earlier in the year: Michael Crabtree: [...]
December 8th, 2009 at 11:51 am
I suspect it has at least some small element of corporate sponsorship. “Happily married man” projects an image of stable respectability that “horndog playboy” just doesn’t. Although you never know, maybe the “horndog” angle could be good for some company out there looking for a spokesmodel. Maybe Tiger could start hawking smartphone privacy software:
* Auto-masks caller ID on incoming or outgoing calls for individual numbers!
* Auto-encrypts text messages for individual numbers, or by user-configured keywords!
* Only $19.99 per download, available for BlackBerry and iPhone!
Hey, it could happen.
December 8th, 2009 at 12:47 pm
Point taken, although I can’t really think of too many of his product endorsements that requires a family man, per se.