The PoliBlog
Collective


Information
The Collective
ARCHIVES
Saturday, March 10, 2024
By Dr. Steven Taylor

Regardless of anything else that one may wish to say about Hugo Chávez, President of Venezuela, there can be no doubt that he is a master of drawing attention to himself in a way that bolsters his own political capital. While his exact ideology is somewhat murky, he style is populistic. Indeed, he has brought a 21st Century twist to populistic politics by focusing both on his own national audience as well as to an international audience, especially regionally in the Americas.

There have been modern figures in the region whose appeals have transcended state borders, such as Fidel Castro and Che Guevarra, but none have cultivated that appeal in the PR-oriented way that Chávez has. Further, while Castro clearly sought a leadership role in the region as the father of revolution in the region, the constraints of the Cold War (and even after) meant that he could not operate as a mainstream regional leader in the same way that Chávez has done. Further, Venezuela’s national wealth makes the leader of that state rather different than the leader of Cuba. Another different element here is that Chávez’s regional popularity campaign is a tool to help further consolidate his power back home–a motivation that Castro did not have to worry about.

An example of the Chávez brand of regional populism was an anti-Bush rally that he headlined in Bueons Aires, Argentina. Via the BBC:

It was the kind of situation that the Venezuelan leader, Hugo Chavez, loves - 40,000 flag-waving supporters joining him in hurling insults at the US President, George W Bush.

He was at a football stadium in the Argentine capital, Buenos Aires, leading what he called an anti-imperialist rally to coincide with Mr Bush’s arrival in neighbouring Uruguay.

Most of the crowd were members of trade unions, left-wing and human rights organisations, those who already supported Mr Chavez and what he calls his brand of socialism for the 21st Century.

It is very smart politics. For one thing Chávez is using the Bush visit as a vehicle to draw attention to himself, knowing full well that he will get international coverage. Further, it gives him the chance to appear before a huge, friendly audience while Bush faces mixed receptions wherever he goes. It creates a set of media images that are quite beneficial for Chávez.

The NYT version of the story (Bush and Chávez Spar at Distance Over Latin Visit notes:

President Bush began the first full day of his weeklong trip to Latin America here on Friday promising job-creating aid but ended up competing for attention with President Hugo Chávez of Venezuela, who called the American visit an act of imperialism, adding, “Gringo, go home!”

[…]

“The Bush plan is ridiculous,” Mr. Chávez said at the gathering in Buenos Aires, across the Río de la Plata from Montevideo, Uruguay, Mr. Bush’s next stop. “He thinks he is Columbus, discovering poverty after seven years in power.”

The Columbus reference was no accident, and certainly was not meant to be a positive one, regardless of the comments about poverty itself.

The piece continues:

At the rally Friday night, Mr. Chávez said he had watched Mr. Bush on television in Brazil and concluded that “he is afraid to say my name” because Mr. Chávez’s vision of “21st century socialism” is advancing in the region.

“Iraq, Iraq, Iraq, terrorism, security, Iraq, Iraq, Iraq,” he said mockingly. “He seems incapable of developing even a single idea.”

In spite of the Chávez avoidance, though, Mr. Bush’s trip seemed intended to counter the Venezuelan’s anti-American message, signs of which have been visible everywhere.

I sincerely wonder if Chávez knows what “21st century socialism” means aside from staying in power and spending a lot of oil revenue (both at home and abroad) to do so. Further, one wonders what happens to the model if oil prices recede.

Technorati tags: , ,

Sphere: Related Content

6 Comments

  • el
  • pt
    1. I wonder if I shall ever see news coverage of anti-Hugo demonstrations when he travels abroad. Since he isn’t allowed to shoot demonstrators in other Latin American countries, some have been fairly big in the past. I predict I’ll see that footage on the evening news in about … never. That’s not because of some plot, but because it isn’t directly related our politician, nor does it fit into the pre-existing paradigms in the heads of most of our reporters.

      Comment by Honza P — Saturday, March 10, 2024 @ 3:34 pm

    2. My guess is that there aren’t massive anti-Chavez demonstrations. The ability to mobilize left-leaning groups in anti-US demonstrations is a known historical quantity, whether Bush is President or not.

      I am not sure who would show up, or what they would be seeking, in terms of an anti-Chavez rally–aside from within Venezuela. And there have been such rallies in Ven.

      Comment by Dr. Steven Taylor — Saturday, March 10, 2024 @ 4:02 pm

    3. Those who use the term “paradigm”, I’m convince are incapable of original thought.

      Comment by Chris Brown — Saturday, March 10, 2024 @ 5:52 pm

    4. The US has been helping in South America for years…granted we’ve also interferred in a bunch of countries there as well, but if we were to withdraw the aid that we’ve given countries like Hounduras and Panama, these countries would really feel the bite. Even the ones like Columbia where we are assisting with counter drug, it seems like we try to help and it’s viewed as spreading influence, or basically the same thing we tried to prevent with the Monroe Doctine, but it seems that no matter what we do, we are always the bad guys. Welcome to being a good samaritian from the US? It kinda sux.

      Comment by Bill — Saturday, March 10, 2024 @ 9:34 pm

    5. Well, to be fair the reason countries tend to get involved in the affairs of other countries, the purpose is to enhance one’s own national interest. As such, I think it is fair to say that the reason the US is involved in Latin America is to enhance its own influence, either in terms of security or economics.

      Certainly we aren’t in Panama out of altruism, for example (nor Colombia or Honduras, for that matter–all of those connections serve US national interests in one way or another, or, at least, they are supposed to).

      I understand where you are coming from, but ultimately the US record in the region is mixed and continues to be. But of course it is also a complex record. People like Chavez oversimplify and play a certain kind of politics. However, the US has allies in the region and is hard;y universally seen a the “bad guy.”

      We are, however, often seen at the 900 lbs gorilla that cannot be ignored and must be placated, but that can also be useful to have around. It all depends on the context.

      Comment by Dr. Steven Taylor — Saturday, March 10, 2024 @ 10:02 pm

    6. […] Hugo Chávez: Master Showman (More on Bush in Latin America) […]

      Pingback by PoliBlog ™: A Rough Draft of my Thoughts » Bush in Latin America: Mexico — Tuesday, March 13, 2024 @ 7:58 am

    RSS feed for comments on this post.

    The trackback url for this post is: http://poliblogger.com/wp-trackback-poliblog.html?p=11603

    NOTE: I will delete any TrackBacks that do not actually link and refer to this post.

    Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.




    Visitors Since 2/15/03
    Blogroll

    ---


    Advertisement

    Advertisement


    Powered by WordPress